The ‘Partner exploitation and violence in teenage intimate relationships’ research by the NSPCC and Bristol University provides us with an interesting (and alarming) glimpse at ‘standardised relational pair’ categories (Sacks, 1992) and the moral accountability attached to them (Jayussi, 1984). Sacks’ work on categories and their deployment found that certain categories go together like ‘boyfriend–girlfriend’. Members of these categories which form ‘standardised relational pairs’ have rights, responsibilities and duties to each other. In our example ‘boyfriend–girlfriend’, it is presumed that each person should provide a safe, supportive, caring and respectful relationship environment for each other to grow and develop. It follows then that category pairs and associated predicates (rights, responsibilities etc) are relational in the sense that one may be expected to follow the next with accountability as a moral-procedural requirement. Breaches between these categories and predicates ‘one in six said they had been pressured into sexual intercourse and 1 in 16 said they had been raped’, tend to generate moral outrage/alarm and interactional repair solutions ‘parents and schools can perform a vital role in teaching them about loving and safe relationships, and what to do if they are suffering from violence or abuse’.
Teen girls abused by boyfriends warns NSPCC
Gender-Based Violence
Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions
A tutorial on membership categorization
-
Compass Journals- Issue Information June 10, 2013
- Review of Literature on Media Literacy June 10, 2013
- Work, Family, and Accounts of Mothers’ Lives Using Discourse to Navigate Intensive Mothering Ideals June 10, 2013
- Rethinking Migrant Families from a Transnational Perspective: Experiences of Parents and Their Children June 10, 2013
- Citizenship on the Margins: A Critique of Scholarship on Marginalized Women and Community Activism June 10, 2013
-
-
